¡¶darwin and modern science¡·

ÏÂÔØ±¾Êé

Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©

darwin and modern science- µÚ68²¿·Ö


°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
e¡¡oldest¡¡known¡¡representatives¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Equisetales¡¡the¡¡leaves¡¡were¡¡highly¡¡developed¡¡and¡¡dichotomously¡¡divided£»¡¡thus¡¡differing¡¡greatly¡¡from¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡scale¡­leaves¡¡of¡¡the¡¡recent¡¡Horsetails£»¡¡or¡¡even¡¡from¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡linear¡¡leaves¡¡of¡¡the¡¡later¡¡Calamites¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡early¡¡members¡¡of¡¡the¡¡class£»¡¡in¡¡their¡¡forked¡¡leaves£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡anatomical¡¡characters£»¡¡show¡¡an¡¡approximation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Sphenophyllales£»¡¡which¡¡are¡¡chiefly¡¡represented¡¡by¡¡the¡¡large¡¡genus¡¡Sphenophyllum£»¡¡ranging¡¡through¡¡the¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Middle¡¡Devonian¡¡onwards¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡were¡¡plants¡¡with¡¡rather¡¡slender£»¡¡ribbed¡¡stems£»¡¡bearing¡¡whorls¡¡of¡¡wedge¡­shaped¡¡or¡¡deeply¡¡forked¡¡leaves£»¡¡six¡¡being¡¡the¡¡typical¡¡number¡¡in¡¡each¡¡whorl¡£¡¡¡¡From¡¡their¡¡weak¡¡habit¡¡it¡¡has¡¡been¡¡conjectured£»¡¡with¡¡much¡¡probability£»¡¡that¡¡they¡¡may¡¡have¡¡been¡¡climbing¡¡plants£»¡¡like¡¡the¡¡scrambling¡¡Bedstraws¡¡of¡¡our¡¡hedgerows¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡anatomy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stem¡¡is¡¡simple¡¡and¡¡root¡­like£»¡¡the¡¡cones¡¡are¡¡remarkable¡¡for¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡each¡¡scale¡¡or¡¡sporophyll¡¡is¡¡a¡¡double¡¡structure£»¡¡consisting¡¡of¡¡a¡¡lower£»¡¡usually¡¡sterile¡¡lobe¡¡and¡¡one¡¡or¡¡more¡¡upper¡¡lobes¡¡bearing¡¡the¡¡sporangia£»¡¡in¡¡one¡¡species¡¡both¡¡parts¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sporophyll¡¡were¡¡fertile¡£¡¡¡¡Sphenophyllum¡¡was¡¡evidently¡¡much¡¡specialised£»¡¡the¡¡only¡¡other¡¡known¡¡genus¡¡is¡¡based¡¡on¡¡an¡¡isolated¡¡cone£»¡¡Cheirostrobus£»¡¡of¡¡Lower¡¡Carboniferous¡¡age£»¡¡with¡¡an¡¡extraordinarily¡¡complex¡¡structure¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡this¡¡genus¡¡especially£»¡¡but¡¡also¡¡in¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡group£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡an¡¡evident¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Equisetales£»¡¡hence¡¡it¡¡is¡¡of¡¡great¡¡interest¡¡that¡¡Nathorst¡¡has¡¡described£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Devonian¡¡of¡¡Bear¡¡Island¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Arctic¡¡regions£»¡¡a¡¡new¡¡genus¡¡Pseudobornia£»¡¡consisting¡¡of¡¡large¡¡plants£»¡¡remarkable¡¡for¡¡their¡¡highly¡¡compound¡¡leaves¡¡which£»¡¡when¡¡found¡¡detached£»¡¡were¡¡taken¡¡for¡¡the¡¡fronds¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Fern¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡whorled¡¡arrangement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡leaves£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡habit¡¡of¡¡the¡¡plant£»¡¡suggest¡¡affinities¡¡either¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Equisetales¡¡or¡¡the¡¡Sphenophyllales£»¡¡Nathorst¡¡makes¡¡the¡¡genus¡¡the¡¡type¡¡of¡¡a¡¡new¡¡class£»¡¡the¡¡Pseudoborniales¡£¡¡¡¡£¨A¡£G¡£¡¡Nathorst£»¡¡¡¨Zur¡¡Oberdevonischen¡¡Flora¡¡der¡¡Baren¡­Insel¡¨£»¡¡¡¨Kongl¡£¡¡Svenska¡¡Vetenskaps¡­Akademiens¡¡Handlingar¡¨¡¡Bd¡£¡¡36£»¡¡No¡£¡¡3£»¡¡Stockholm£»¡¡1902¡££©

The¡¡available¡¡data£»¡¡though¡¡still¡¡very¡¡fragmentary£»¡¡certainly¡¡suggest¡¡that¡¡both¡¡Equisetales¡¡and¡¡Sphenophyllales¡¡may¡¡have¡¡sprung¡¡from¡¡a¡¡common¡¡stock¡¡having¡¡certain¡¡fern¡­like¡¡characters¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand¡¡the¡¡Sphenophylls£»¡¡and¡¡especially¡¡the¡¡peculiar¡¡genus¡¡Cheirostrobus£»¡¡have¡¡in¡¡their¡¡anatomy¡¡a¡¡good¡¡deal¡¡in¡¡common¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Lycopods£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡late¡¡years¡¡they¡¡have¡¡been¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡the¡¡derivatives¡¡of¡¡a¡¡stock¡¡common¡¡to¡¡that¡¡class¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Equisetales¡£¡¡¡¡At¡¡any¡¡rate¡¡the¡¡characters¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Sphenophyllales¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡group¡¡Pseudoborniales¡¡suggest¡¡the¡¡existence£»¡¡at¡¡a¡¡very¡¡early¡¡period£»¡¡of¡¡a¡¡synthetic¡¡race¡¡of¡¡plants£»¡¡combining¡¡the¡¡characters¡¡of¡¡various¡¡phyla¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Vascular¡¡Cryptogams¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡may¡¡further¡¡be¡¡mentioned¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Psilotaceae£»¡¡an¡¡isolated¡¡epiphytic¡¡family¡¡hitherto¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Lycopods£»¡¡have¡¡been¡¡regarded¡¡by¡¡several¡¡recent¡¡authors¡¡as¡¡the¡¡last¡¡survivors¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Sphenophyllales£»¡¡which¡¡they¡¡resemble¡¡both¡¡in¡¡their¡¡anatomy¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡position¡¡of¡¡their¡¡sporangia¡£

The¡¡Lycopods£»¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡their¡¡early¡¡history¡¡is¡¡known£»¡¡are¡¡remarkable¡¡rather¡¡for¡¡their¡¡high¡¡development¡¡in¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡times¡¡than¡¡for¡¡any¡¡indications¡¡of¡¡a¡¡more¡¡primitive¡¡ancestry¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡recent¡¡Flora£»¡¡two¡¡of¡¡the¡¡four¡¡living¡¡genera¡¡£¨Excluding¡¡Psilotaceae¡££©¡¡£¨Selaginella¡¡and¡¡Isoetes£©¡¡have¡¡spores¡¡of¡¡two¡¡kinds£»¡¡while¡¡the¡¡other¡¡two¡¡£¨Lycopodium¡¡and¡¡Phylloglossum£©¡¡are¡¡homosporous¡£¡¡¡¡Curiously¡¡enough£»¡¡no¡¡certain¡¡instance¡¡of¡¡a¡¡homosporous¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡Lycopod¡¡has¡¡yet¡¡been¡¡discovered£»¡¡though¡¡well¡­preserved¡¡fructifications¡¡are¡¡numerous¡£¡¡¡¡Wherever¡¡the¡¡facts¡¡have¡¡been¡¡definitely¡¡ascertained£»¡¡we¡¡find¡¡two¡¡kinds¡¡of¡¡spore£»¡¡differentiated¡¡quite¡¡as¡¡sharply¡¡as¡¡in¡¡any¡¡living¡¡members¡¡of¡¡the¡¡group¡£¡¡¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡Lycopods£»¡¡in¡¡fact£»¡¡went¡¡further£»¡¡and¡¡produced¡¡bodies¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡seeds£»¡¡some¡¡of¡¡which¡¡were¡¡actually¡¡regarded£»¡¡for¡¡many¡¡years£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡seeds¡¡of¡¡Gymnosperms¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡specially¡¡advanced¡¡form¡¡of¡¡fructification¡¡goes¡¡back¡¡at¡¡least¡¡as¡¡far¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Lower¡¡Carboniferous£»¡¡while¡¡the¡¡oldest¡¡known¡¡genus¡¡of¡¡Lycopods£»¡¡Bothrodendron£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡found¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Devonian£»¡¡though¡¡not¡¡seed¡­bearing£»¡¡was¡¡typically¡¡heterosporous£»¡¡if¡¡we¡¡may¡¡judge¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Coal¡­measure¡¡species¡£¡¡¡¡No¡¡doubt¡¡homosporous¡¡Lycopods¡¡existed£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡great¡¡prevalence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡higher¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡reproduction¡¡in¡¡days¡¡which¡¡to¡¡us¡¡appear¡¡ancient£»¡¡shows¡¡how¡¡long¡¡a¡¡course¡¡of¡¡evolution¡¡must¡¡have¡¡already¡¡been¡¡passed¡¡through¡¡before¡¡the¡¡oldest¡¡known¡¡members¡¡of¡¡the¡¡group¡¡came¡¡into¡¡being¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡other¡¡characters¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡Lycopods¡¡tell¡¡the¡¡same¡¡tale£»¡¡most¡¡of¡¡them¡¡attained¡¡the¡¡stature¡¡of¡¡trees£»¡¡with¡¡a¡¡corresponding¡¡elaboration¡¡of¡¡anatomical¡¡structure£»¡¡and¡¡even¡¡the¡¡herbaceous¡¡forms¡¡show¡¡no¡¡special¡¡simplicity¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡appears¡¡from¡¡recent¡¡work¡¡that¡¡herbaceous¡¡Lycopods£»¡¡indistinguishable¡¡from¡¡our¡¡recent¡¡Selaginellas£»¡¡already¡¡existed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Coal¡­measures£»¡¡while¡¡one¡¡herbaceous¡¡form¡¡£¨Miadesmia£©¡¡is¡¡known¡¡to¡¡have¡¡borne¡¡seeds¡£

The¡¡utmost¡¡that¡¡can¡¡be¡¡said¡¡for¡¡primitiveness¡¡of¡¡character¡¡in¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡Lycopods¡¡is¡¡that¡¡the¡¡anatomy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stem£»¡¡in¡¡its¡¡primary¡¡ground¡­plan£»¡¡as¡¡distinguished¡¡from¡¡its¡¡secondary¡¡growth£»¡¡was¡¡simpler¡¡than¡¡that¡¡of¡¡most¡¡Lycopodiums¡¡and¡¡Selaginellas¡¡at¡¡the¡¡present¡¡day¡£¡¡¡¡There¡¡are¡¡also¡¡some¡¡peculiarities¡¡in¡¡the¡¡underground¡¡organs¡¡£¨Stigmaria£©¡¡which¡¡suggest¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡a¡¡somewhat¡¡imperfect¡¡differentiation¡¡between¡¡root¡¡and¡¡stem£»¡¡but¡¡precisely¡¡parallel¡¡difficulties¡¡are¡¡met¡¡with¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡living¡¡Selaginellas£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡some¡¡degree¡¡in¡¡species¡¡of¡¡Lycopodium¡£

In¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡their¡¡high¡¡development¡¡in¡¡past¡¡ages¡¡the¡¡Lycopods£»¡¡recent¡¡and¡¡fossil£»¡¡constitute£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡whole£»¡¡a¡¡homogeneous¡¡group£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡is¡¡little¡¡at¡¡present¡¡to¡¡connect¡¡them¡¡with¡¡other¡¡phyla¡£¡¡¡¡Anatomically¡¡some¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Sphenophylls¡¡is¡¡indicated£»¡¡and¡¡perhaps¡¡the¡¡recent¡¡Psilotaceae¡¡give¡¡some¡¡support¡¡to¡¡this¡¡connection£»¡¡for¡¡while¡¡their¡¡nearest¡¡alliance¡¡appears¡¡to¡¡be¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Sphenophylls£»¡¡they¡¡approach¡¡the¡¡Lycopods¡¡in¡¡anatomy£»¡¡habit£»¡¡and¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡branching¡£

The¡¡typically¡¡microphyllous¡¡character¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Lycopods£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡relation¡¡between¡¡sporangium¡¡and¡¡sporophyll¡¡which¡¡obtains¡¡throughout¡¡the¡¡class£»¡¡have¡¡led¡¡various¡¡botanists¡¡to¡¡regard¡¡them¡¡as¡¡the¡¡most¡¡primitive¡¡phylum¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Vascular¡¡Cryptogams¡£¡¡¡¡There¡¡is¡¡nothing¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fossil¡¡record¡¡to¡¡disprove¡¡this¡¡view£»¡¡but¡¡neither¡¡is¡¡there¡¡anything¡¡to¡¡support¡¡it£»¡¡for¡¡this¡¡class¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡we¡¡know¡¡is¡¡no¡¡more¡¡ancient¡¡than¡¡the¡¡megaphyllous¡¡Cryptogams£»¡¡and¡¡its¡¡earliest¡¡representatives¡¡show¡¡no¡¡special¡¡simplicity¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡indications¡¡of¡¡affinity¡¡with¡¡Sphenophylls¡¡are¡¡of¡¡any¡¡value¡¡the¡¡Lycopods¡¡are¡¡open¡¡to¡¡suspicion¡¡of¡¡reduction¡¡from¡¡a¡¡megaphyllous¡¡ancestry£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡direct¡¡palaeontological¡¡evidence¡¡for¡¡such¡¡a¡¡history¡£

The¡¡general¡¡conclusions¡¡to¡¡which¡¡we¡¡are¡¡led¡¡by¡¡a¡¡consideration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fossil¡¡record¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Vascular¡¡Cryptogams¡¡are¡¡still¡¡very¡¡hypothetical£»¡¡but¡¡may¡¡be¡¡provisionally¡¡stated¡¡as¡¡follows£º

The¡¡Ferns¡¡go¡¡back¡¡to¡¡the¡¡earliest¡¡known¡¡period¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡Mesozoic¡¡times¡¡practically¡¡all¡¡the¡¡existing¡¡families¡¡had¡¡appeared£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡the¡¡class¡¡was¡¡less¡¡extensive¡¡than¡¡formerly¡¡believed£»¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡supposed¡¡Ferns¡¡of¡¡that¡¡age¡¡having¡¡proved¡¡to¡¡be¡¡seed¡­bearing¡¡plants¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡oldest¡¡authentic¡¡representatives¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Ferns¡¡were¡¡megaphyllous¡¡plants£»¡¡broadly¡¡speaking£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡type¡¡as¡¡those¡¡of¡¡later¡¡epochs£»¡¡though¡¡differing¡¡much¡¡in¡¡detail¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡far¡¡back¡¡as¡¡the¡¡record¡¡extends¡¡they¡¡show¡¡no¡¡sign¡¡of¡¡becoming¡¡merged¡¡with¡¡other¡¡phyla¡¡in¡¡any¡¡synthetic¡¡group¡£

The¡¡Equisetales¡¡likewise¡¡have¡¡a¡¡long¡¡history£»¡¡and¡¡manifestly¡¡attained¡¡their¡¡greatest¡¡development¡¡in¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡times¡£¡¡¡¡Their¡¡oldest¡¡forms¡¡show¡¡an¡¡approach¡¡to¡¡the¡¡extinct¡¡class¡¡Sphenophyllales£»¡¡which¡¡connects¡¡them¡¡to¡¡some¡¡extent£»¡¡by¡¡anatomical¡¡characters£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Lycopods¡£¡¡¡¡At¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡the¡¡oldest¡¡Equisetales¡¡show¡¡a¡¡somewhat¡¡megaphyllous¡¡character£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡more¡¡marked¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Devonian¡¡Pseudoborniales¡£¡¡¡¡Some¡¡remote¡¡affinity¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Ferns¡¡£¨which¡¡has¡¡also¡¡been¡¡upheld¡¡on¡¡other¡¡grounds£©¡¡may¡¡thus¡¡be¡¡indicated¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Sphenophyllales¡¡we¡¡may¡¡have¡¡the¡¡much¡­modified¡¡representatives¡¡of¡¡a¡¡very¡¡ancient¡¡synthetic¡¡group¡£

The¡¡Lycopods¡¡likewise¡¡attained¡¡their¡¡maximum¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Palaeozoic£»¡¡and¡¡show£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡whole£»¡¡a¡¡greater¡¡elaboration¡¡of¡¡structure¡¡in¡¡their¡¡early¡¡forms¡¡than¡¡at¡¡any¡¡later¡¡period£»¡¡while¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡maintaining¡¡a¡¡considerable¡¡degree¡¡of¡¡uniformity¡¡in¡¡morphological¡¡characters¡¡throughout¡¡their¡¡history¡£¡¡The¡¡Sphenophyllales¡¡are¡¡the¡¡only¡¡other¡¡class¡¡with¡¡which¡¡they¡¡show¡¡any¡¡relation£»¡¡if¡¡such¡¡a¡¡connection¡¡existed£»¡¡the¡¡common¡¡point¡¡of¡¡origin¡¡must¡¡lie¡¡exceedingly¡¡far¡¡back¡£

The¡¡fossil¡¡record£»¡¡as¡¡at¡¡present¡¡known£»¡¡cannot£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡things£»¡¡throw¡¡any¡¡direct¡¡light¡¡on¡¡what¡¡is¡¡perhaps¡¡the¡¡most¡¡disputed¡¡question¡¡in¡¡the¡¡morphology¡¡of¡¡plantsthe¡¡origin¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alternating¡¡generations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡higher¡¡Cryptogams¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Spermophyta¡£¡¡¡¡At¡¡the¡¡earliest¡¡period¡¡to¡¡which¡¡terrestrial¡¡plants¡¡have¡¡been¡¡traced¡¡back¡¡all¡¡the¡¡groups¡¡of¡¡Vascular¡¡Cryptogams¡¡were¡¡in¡¡a¡¡highly¡¡advanced¡¡stage¡¡of¡¡evolution£»¡¡while¡¡innumerable¡¡Seed¡­plantspresumably¡¡the¡¡descendants¡¡of¡¡Cryptogamic¡¡ancestorswere¡¡already¡¡flourishing¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand¡¡we¡¡know¡¡practically¡¡nothing¡¡of¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡Bryophyta£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡even¡¡for¡¡their¡¡existence¡¡at¡¡that¡¡period¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡termed¡¡conclusive¡£¡¡¡¡While¡¡there¡¡are¡¡thus¡¡no¡¡palaeontological¡¡grounds¡¡for¡¡the¡¡hypothesis¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Vascular¡¡plants¡¡came¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Bryophytic
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£ ÔÞһϠÌí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü